TÜRKİYE'DE DENETİMLİ SERBESTLİK DENEYİMİ: KRİMİNOJENİK İHTİYAÇLAR VE DENETİMLİ SERBESTLİK ALTINDAKİ BİREYLERİN BEKLENTİLERİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-XXXIV
Language : null
Konu : Sosyoloji
Number of pages: 1151-1171.
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Keywords


  • Andrews, D. A.; Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, LexisNexis, Anderson Publishing, New Providence, NJ.

  • Andrews, D. A.; Bonta, J.; Hoge, R. D. (1990) Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1): 19 - 52.

  • Becker, G. S.; Mulligan, C. B. (1997) The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3): 729 - 758

  • Bengtsson, T. T. (2016) Performing Hypermasculinity: Experiences with Confined Young Offenders. Men and Masculinities, 19(4): 410 - 428, DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15595083

  • Bourgon, G.; Guiterrez, L. (2013). The Importance of Building Good Relationships in Community Corrections: Evidence, Theory, and Practice of the Therapeutic Alliance. In P. Ugwudike & P. Raynor (Eds.), What Works in Offender Compliance: International Perspectives and Evidence - Based Practice (pp. 256 - 279) London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Chernoff, N. W.; Simon, R. J., (2000). Women and Crime the World Over. Gender Issues, 18(3): 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-0000015-0

  • Decarpes, P.; Durnescu, I. (2014). Probation and Community Sanctions. In G. Bruinsma; D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 3957 – 3963). New York: Springer Rereference.

  • S. (2016). Yeniden Sosyalleşme ve Toplumsal Bütünleşme Süreçleri: Denetimli

  • S. (2017). Denetimli Serbestlikte Yeniden Sosyalleşme Suç ve Dezavantajlılığın

  • Dood T.; Hunter P. (1992). The National Prison Survey 1991, London: HMSO.

  • Evren, C.; Umut, G.; Bozkurt, M.; Evren, B.; Yılmaz, H. (2017) Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Drug Use Disorders Identification Test–Extended (Turkish DUDIT-E) in substance-dependent adults under probation, Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 27(1): 70-75. DOI: 10.1080/24750573.2017.1293240

  • France, A.; Bottrell, D.; Armstrong, D. (2012). A Political Ecology of Youth and Crime, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

  • Gray P. (2005). The Politics of Risk and Young Offenders Experiences of Social Exclusion and Restorative Justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 45(6): 938-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi018

  • Healy, D., O’Donnell, I. (2008). Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers. The Journal of Community and Crime Justice, 55(1), 25 – 38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550507085676

  • Kirkwood, S., McNeill, F. (2015). Integration and reintegration: comparing pathways to citizenship through asylum and criminal justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice (CCJ), 15(5), 511– 526. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895815575618

  • Krienert, J. L. (2003) Masculinity and Crime: A Quantitative Exploration of Messerschmidt’s Hypothesis, Electronic Journal of Sociology. Retrieved from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.2/01_krienert.html.

  • Latessa, E. J., Lowenkamp, C. T. (2006). What works in reducing recidivism. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 3(3), 521 – 535.

  • Lochner, L. (2004). Education, Work, and Crime: A Human Capital Approach. International Economic Review, 45(3): 811–843. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00288.x

  • Lochner, L. (2010). Education and Crime. In P. Peterson; E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education Volume 2 (pp. 239 245) Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Machin, S.; Marie, O; Vujic, S. (2010) The Crime Reducing Effect of Education, CEP Discussion Paper No 979, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.

  • McNeill F.; Dawson M. (2014). Social Solidarity, Penal Evolution and Probation. BJC The British Journal of Criminology, 54(5): 892-907.

  • Özbek, M. S. (2010). Çağdaş ceza adaleti sistemlerinde alternatif çözüm arayışları ve arabuluculuk uygulaması, Kazancı Hukuk Dergisi. 1: 116-183. Retrieved from http://angora.baskent.edu.tr/acik_arsiv/dosya_oku.php?psn=8767&yn=17&dn=

  • Peace, R. (2001). Social exclusion: a concept in need of definition?. Social Policy Journal of New -Zealand, 16, 17 – 36.

  • Penal Institution Statistic. Turkey Statistical Institution (2017). Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24676.

  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Justice. (2015). Probation in Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.cep-probation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/PROBATION-in-TURKEY.pdf

  • Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531 – 578.

  • Simons, R. L., Robertson, J. F. (1989) The Impact of parenting factors, deviant peers, and coping style upon adolescent drug use. Family Relations, 38(3), 273 – 281. doi: 10.2307/585052

  • Smith D.; Stewart J. (1997). Probation and Social Exclusion. Social Policy Administration, 31(5): 96 - 115.

  • Stewart G. (1996). Housing, In M. Drakeford; M. Vanstone (Eds.), Beyond Offending Behavior. Aldershot: Arena.

  • Stewart G.; Stewart J. (1993). Social Circumstances of younger Offenders Under Probation Supervision, Wakefield, ACOP.

  • Tuncer, G.; Duru, M. N. (2011). İş Doyumu: Denetimli Serbestlik Şubelerinde Çalışan Personel Örneği, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi (İAÜD). 10(3): 115 - 142. Retrieved from http://iaud.aydin.edu.tr/makaleler cilt1sayi9/12_gorkem_tuncer.pdf

  • W. Groot & H. M. van den Brink (2010) The effects of education on crime, Applied Economics, 42:3, 279-289, DOI: 10.1080/00036840701604412

  • Wright, J. P.; Cullen, F. T. (2004) Employment, peers, and life- course transitions. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 183-205. doi: 10.1080/07418820400095781

  • Yavuz, H. A. (2011). Ceza Adalet Sisteminde Denetimli Serbestlik (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.

  • Yavuz, H. A. (2012). Denetimli Serbestliğin Türk Ceza Adalet Sistemindeki Tarihsel Gelişim Süreci, TBB Dergisi, 100: 318-342.

  • Yavuz, H. A. (2016). Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik Mümkün Müdür? Dünü, Bugünü Ve Yarınıyla Türk Ceza Adalet Sisteminde Denetimli Serbestlik. In D. Özyörük (Ed.), Türkiye’de Denetimli Serbestlik 10. Yıl Uluslararası Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı (pp. 15 - 23), Ankara: Adalet Bakanlığı Ceza Ve Tevkifevleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Atalay Matbası. Retrieved from Http://Www.Cte-Ds.Adalet.Gov.Tr/E_Bulten/Sempozyum_E_Kitap.Pdf

  • Yazici, A. B., Yazici, E., Akkisi Kumsar, N., & Erol, A. (2015). Addiction profile in probation practices in Turkey: 5-year data analysis. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 2259–2263. http://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S89417

  • Yüncü, Z.; Aydın, R.; Aydın, C.; Özbaran, B.; Köse, S. (2016) Determination of Clinical and Socio-demographical Di erences of Adolescents Applying to a Treatment Center with Family Encouragement or the Decision of the Probation O ce and Determination of Predictive Factors in Maintaining Soberness among Probation Cases, Arch Neuropsychiatr. 53: 130 - 135. DOI: 10.5152/npa.2015.8719

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics