1970-2020 Dönemi için Matematik Eğitimi Araştırmalarındaki En Etkili 500 Makale: Bibliyometrik Atıf Analizi
Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı, 1970-2020 dönemi için matematik eğitimi araştırmasındaki en çok atıf alan 500 makaleyi belirlemek ve değerlendirmek, daha sonra bibliyometrik atıf analizi kullanarak bu tarihsel platformun evrimi üzerindeki etkisini tartışmaktır. Amerika Bileşik Devletleri (ABD) en çok atıf alan 500 makale, araştırmacılar ve kurumlar açısından en yüksek yüzdeye sahip olan en verimli ülkedir. En üretken kurum Wisconsin Üniversitesi olup ABD’de bulunmaktadır. Belçika’daki KU Leuven Üniversitesinden Verschaffel L 34 makalesi ile en üretken yazardır. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (JRME) ise en önde gelen dergidir. Matematik başarısı, en çok atıf alan 500 makale en çok ilgi gören ve en çok çalışılan konudur. Matematik eğitimi araştırmalarının kökenini esas olarak matematik eğitimi literatürü ardından genel eğitim, psikoloji, eğitim teknolojisi, biliş ve beyin araştırmaları ile eğitim psikolojisi izlemektedir. Aynı zamanda bu çalışma, bibliyometrinin tüm klasik yasalarının yaklaşık 40 yıl önce kuramsallaşmasına rağmen, bu yasaların matematik eğitimi araştırmalarının mevcut evrimini hala aydınlatabildiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu önemli sonuçlara dayanarak, bu araştırma bibliyometrik atıf analizi kullanarak matematik eğitim araştırmalarının kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamaktadır.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of the study is to identify and assess the 500 most-cited articles in mathematics education research for the period 1970-2020, and then discuss the impact on the evolution of the historical platform by using bibliometric citation analysis. The USA is the most productive country in terms of having the highest percentage of the top 500 papers, researchers, and institutions. The most productive institution is The University of Wisconsin located in the United States. Verschaffel L from KU Leuven in Belgium is the most prolific researcher, with 34 articles. The Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (JRME) is the leading journal. Mathematics achievement is the most studied topic that has garnered the greatest interest in the top 500 articles. Mathematics education research has its origins mainly in the literature of mathematics education, followed by general education, psychology, educational technology, cognition and brain research, and educational psychology. This study also reveals that although all the classic laws of bibliometrics were theorized about 40 years ago, these are still capable of clarifying the current evolution of mathematics education research. Based on these important results, the study portrays a comprehensive understanding of mathematics education research by using bibliometric citation analysis.
Keywords
- Abt, H. A. (2012). A publication index that is independent of age. Scientometrics, 91, 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0525-4
- Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
- Baki, A., Güven, B., Karataş, İ., Akkan, Y. & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2011). Trends in Turkish mathematics education research: From 1998 to 2007. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 40(40), 57-68.
- Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
- Barbin, E. & Tzanakis, C. (2014). History of mathematics and education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 255-260). Springer Reference.
- Benn, R. & Burton, R. (1996). Absolutism and Eurocentrism in mathematics and the access alternative. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 27(3), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739960270311
- Campbell, F. M. (1990). National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 78(4), 376-382.
- Chen, C., Ibekwe‐SanJuan, F. & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
- Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M. A. Z. & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children's concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 192-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/749610
- Clements, D. H. & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034954
- Clements M.A. & Ellerton N.F. (1996). Mathematics Education Research: Past, Present and Future. UNESCO. http://unescobkkk.org.publicat/aceid.htm.
- Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 23(1), 2-33. https://doi.org/10.5951/ jresematheduc.23.1.0002
- Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007013
- Drijvers, P., Grauwin, S. & Trouche, L. (2020). When bibliometrics met mathematics education research: The case of instrumental orchestration. ZDM, 52,1455-1469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01169-3
- Fetscherin, M. & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 380-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.010
- Frankel J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (8th ed.). Graw Hill Companies.
- Garfield E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Policy, 10(3), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/10.3.112
- Guilera, G., Barrios, M. & Gómez-Benito, J. (2013). Meta-analysis in psychology: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 94(3), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0761-2
- Hanna, G. & Sidoli, N. (2002). The story of ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(2), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021162617070
- He, L., Fang, H., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Ge, H., Li, C., ... & He, H. (2020). The 100 most-cited articles in urological surgery: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 75, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.
- Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042
- Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
- Inglis, M. & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462-500. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462
- Jerrim, J. (2015). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.
- Kilpatrick, J. (2014). A history of research in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 267–272). Springer, Cham.
- Kumar, S., Sureka, R. & Vashishtha, A. (2020). The Journal of Heritage Tourism: A bibliometric overview since its inception. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1754423
- Lester, F. K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM, 37(6), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655854
- Link A. M. (1999). US and non-US submissions: An analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA, 280, 246–247. https://doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.246
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7326/00034819-151-4-200908180-00135
- Niss, M. (2019). The very multi-faceted nature of mathematics education research. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(2), 2-7. https://www.jstor. org/stable/26757463
- Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka law-A testing procedure. Information Processing and Management, 21(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(85)900 55-X
- Presmeg, N. (2009). Mathematics education research embracing arts and sciences. ZDM, 41(1), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0136
- Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press.
- Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S. & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0022-0663.93.2.346
- Rittle-Johnson, B. & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/00220663.91.1.175
- Scandura, J. M. (1970). A research basis for mathematics education. The High School Journal, 53(5), 264-280.
- Sierpinska, A. & Kilpatric, J. (1998). Continuing the search. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for İdentity (pp. 527–548). Kluwer.
- Sriraman, B. & English, L. D. (2005). Theories of mathematics education: A global survey of theoretical frameworks/trends in mathematics education research. ZDM, 37(6), 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655853
- Tate, W.F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652-679. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresemath educ.28.6.0652
- Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2017) Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111, 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
- Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E. & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modeling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90002-7
- Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H. & Ratinckx, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical application problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195-229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0103_2
- Zamorano, M. A. D. (2003). Análisis bibliométrico sobre depresión infantil en España. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3(3), 645-653. EXTENDED ABSTRACT
